Employment Discrimination Guide

Racial Discrimination In Police Employment Section


 

Racial Discrimination In Police Employment Navigation


|

Employment Guide Home Page
Tell A Friend about us
Employment Discrimination Attorney |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Employment Discrimination Attorney |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination |
Sex Discrimination In Employment |
Discrimination Employment |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Laws |



Racial Discrimination In Police Employment Best seller

Buy it Now!



Best Racial Discrimination In Police Employment products

Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment-discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Racial Discrimination In Police Employment sponsors

 

 

Welcome to Employment Discrimination Guide

 

Racial Discrimination In Police Employment Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.



Other Racial Discrimination In Police Employment related Articles

Employment Discrimination Attorney
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967
Sex Discrimination In Employment
What Is Employment Discrimination
Age Discrimination In Employment

Do you want to contribute to our site : submit your articles HERE


Racial Discrimination In Police Employment News

Fired Des Plaines cop alleges racial discrimination

A former Des Plaines police officer fired earlier this year after allegations of misconduct has filed a racial discrimination complaint against the city with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. John Bueno, a 10-year veteran of the department, alleges a superior officer made derogatory and insensitive comments about his Hispanic heritage, both in private and public.

Read more...


Officer fired for ties to biker gang sues Capitol Police for discrimination

The Capitol Police Department is facing a discrimination lawsuit after it dismissed one of its officers due to his affiliation with an allegedly racially charged Read more...

Read more...


How Much Can Potential Employers Ask About You?

Over the past decade, employee background checks have become a billion-dollar business. Some lawmakers think companies that want to know not just about criminal backgrounds but social media passwords have gone too far.

Read more...


Editorial: Panel should get police complaints

Pleas to create an independent review board to review police conduct in Westchester County will likely die for a multitude of reasons, not the least being lack of political will.

Read more...


MI5 warned Scotland Yard that some of its officers attended terrorist training camps

Following the warning, the police officers at London's Metropolitan Police lost their jobs after checks were carried out because of concerns that potential terrorists had infiltrated the force.

Read more...