Employment Discrimination Guide

Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy Section


 

Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy Navigation


|

Employment Guide Home Page
Tell A Friend about us
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
What Is Employment Discrimination |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Sex Discrimination In Employment |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Sex Discrimination In Employment |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Employment Discrimination |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |



Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy Best seller

Buy it Now!



Best Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy products

Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment-discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy sponsors

 

 

Welcome to Employment Discrimination Guide

 

Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.




Ohio Employment Discrimination Policy News

Ohio workplace discrimination victim advocates federal protections - Out & About


Ohio workplace discrimination victim advocates federal protections
Out & About
Ohio laws currently do not protect gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, and Hutchinson would not have been able to bring any lawsuit for workplace discrimination if she had worked for a private sector employer in Ohio.

and more »

Read more...


NJ should ban arrests from job applications - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)


The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)

NJ should ban arrests from job applications
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)
This decision sends a clear message to employers that they have a duty to use employment policies that are free from arbitrary discrimination on the grounds of criminal history. The EEOC's new guidance also is helpful in considering the continued ...
Health Management Group to Pay $260000 to Settle EEOC Wage Discrimination SuitJobmouse

all 59 news articles »

Read more...


'The Bachelor' and 'The Bachelorette': Inside the Racial Discrimination Lawsuit - Daily Beast


Daily Beast

'The Bachelor' and 'The Bachelorette': Inside the Racial Discrimination Lawsuit
Daily Beast
“Legally, we're seeking programming policy changes regarding how they select people,” Mehri told The Daily Beast. “And they have to give people of color the chance to compete on equal footing without regards to their race.” Mehri may want substantive ...

and more »

Read more...


Tips On What Every Employer Should Know - Metropolitan Corporate Counsel


Tips On What Every Employer Should Know
Metropolitan Corporate Counsel
Telman: Our L&E practice primarily focuses on litigating single and class action disputes stemming from workplace harassment and employment discrimination claims. We also represent employers in collective and class actions involving allegations of wage ...

Read more...


EEOC Rules Anti-Trans Bias is Sex Discrimination - Gay City News


Fox News

EEOC Rules Anti-Trans Bias is Sex Discrimination
Gay City News
The president issued a formal policy — though not an executive order — barring such discrimination for all civilian employees of the federal government. Macy's attorney, however, did not want the complaint addressed as an internal government hiring ...
EEOC Releases Important Guidance on Use of Criminal and Arrest Records By ...JD Supra (press release)

all 511 news articles »

Read more...