Employment Discrimination Guide

Male Employment Gender Discrimination Section


 

Male Employment Gender Discrimination Navigation


|

Employment Guide Home Page
Tell A Friend about us
Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Gender Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Attorney |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Sex Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination Cases |
Discrimination Employment |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Discrimination Employment |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Plaintiff Pro Se Won Verdict Employment Discrimination |



Male Employment Gender Discrimination Best seller

Buy it Now!



Best Male Employment Gender Discrimination products

Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment-discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Male Employment Gender Discrimination sponsors

 

 

Welcome to Employment Discrimination Guide

 

Male Employment Gender Discrimination Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

How Effective are Employment Discrimination Laws?

from:


In 1963, a first and vital step toward establishing employment discrimination laws took effect in the form of the EPA. The EPA is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 that sought to rectify the gaping wage differences between working adult women and men. Today, there has been some improvement, but women still see only 77 cents to every dollar that the average American male earns.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 added to the arsenal of employment discrimination laws as an effort to prevent hiring on the basis on race, gender, religious affiliation, or national heritage. These fall under “protected categories” and if violated, the employer can face severe monetary penalties and class-action lawsuits.

The American with Disabilities act was an added entree to the employment discrimination laws platter, providing protection for those with disabilities from receiving harassment or discrimination.

Employment discrimination laws are meant to prevent disparate treatment among employees and prospective hires. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 intended to further fortify the original Title VII amendment by eliminating the claim of “business necessity” in intentional discrimination acts, clarified disparate acts, and provided for damages to those who suffered employment discrimination on the basis of race, gender, national heritage, and disabilities.

Proponents of Affirmative Action advocate that this practice enables a more diverse and equitable workforce. In some countries, however, affirmative action is illegal as it serves to highlight racial backgrounds and thus promote more racism. Opponents in this country argue that affirmative action only adds to invidious hiring practices, impose limits on the freedom of choice, and sets up racial groups against one another. Richard Epstein elucidates this contention in his book Forbidden Grounds.

Family and medical leave is also protected under employment discrimination laws, and one case shows that an employer’s irreverence toward this law costs some big bucks. When a former broker for Merrill Lynch filed suit against the agency for wrongful termination, Merrill Lynch set out to make a settlement agreement. The broker was terminated while on leave, and could very well have garnered a six to seven figure reward for this kind of employment discrimination.

But the inequality is equally expressed when it comes time for paternal leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 mandates that employers provide 12 weeks of unpaid leave for employees who must take care of children or sick family members, but often this extension applies more readily to female workers than men. Another case of discrimination arises in these cases when it appears evident that social expectations cater to women leaving work to care for children, but scoffs at male workers who petition for paternal leave.

Heavy fines ensue for employers, who disobey employment discrimination laws, but the fact alone remains that as long as these acts are necessary, our society has a long way to go to eradicate discrimination. In some cases, it may actually promote it. Only time will tell how well we achieve equilibrium and equality in employment trends.



Male Employment Gender Discrimination News

Gender Discrimination Alleged in Suit Against Kleiner Perkins Similar to ... - Private Equity Hub (press release)


TechCrunch

Gender Discrimination Alleged in Suit Against Kleiner Perkins Similar to ...
Private Equity Hub (press release)
I talked about the case with Lynne Bernabei, a plaintiff's attorney at Washington, DC-based Bernabei & Wachtel who specializes in employment discrimination cases. Here's our conversation, edited for length and clarity: Q: Do the claims made by Pao ...
Partner sues Kleiner Perkins for gender discriminationCNET
Key Details Of The Kleiner Perkins Gender Discrimination LawsuitTechCrunch
Partner sues Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers firm for sex discrimination ...Mercury-Register
VatorNews
all 61 news articles »

Read more...


A Transition in the Law - Business West


Human Resources Journal

A Transition in the Law
Business West
6, 2011, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the termination of an employee, who was born a biological male but identified as a female, based on her non-conformity with gender stereotypes, was unlawful gender discrimination. (See Glenn v.
EEOC Rules That Transgender Employees are Covered Under Title VIIJD Supra (press release)
Ruling that Protects Transgender Workers Goes into Effect TodayPassport Magazine (blog)

all 21 news articles »

Read more...


Federal judge dismisses age and sex discrimination suit against Port Authority - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com


The Star-Ledger - NJ.com

Federal judge dismisses age and sex discrimination suit against Port Authority
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com
Having the same job title and qualifications does not necessarily merit equal pay, a federal judge ruled in dismissing an age and sex discrimination suit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The suit was filed in October 2010 by the ...
Judge tosses Port Authority pay disparity suit7Online.com

all 3 news articles »

Read more...


When 'I'm Too Sexy' Lawsuit Settles, Will IRS Win Too? - Forbes


Forbes

When 'I'm Too Sexy' Lawsuit Settles, Will IRS Win Too?
Forbes
Where else could you find the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) handling a complaint alleging religious and gender discrimination occurring in a lingerie warehouse? This legal action was spawned on the New York site of “Native Intimates.
Fired for being "too hot"Chicago Tribune
Can You Really Be Fired for Being 'Too Hot'?BusinessNewsDaily
Woman Claims She Was Fired From Her Job for Being 'Too Hot,' Forced to Wear a ...New York Magazine
Huffington Post
all 202 news articles »

Read more...


Judge dismisses Port Authority gender discrimination suit - NorthJersey.com


The Star-Ledger - NJ.com

Judge dismisses Port Authority gender discrimination suit
NorthJersey.com
BY SHAWN BOBURG A federal judge has dismissed a discrimination lawsuit alleging the Port Authority paid its female attorneys less because of their gender. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had filed the lawsuit in 2010 after a ...
Judge tosses Port Authority pay disparity suitNewsday

all 5 news articles »

Read more...