Employment Discrimination Guide

Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination Section


 

Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination Navigation


|

Employment Guide Home Page
Tell A Friend about us
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
What Is Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Plaintiff Pro Se Won Verdict Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Sex Discrimination In Employment |
Employment And Discrimination |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Employment And Discrimination |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Attorney |



Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination Best seller

Buy it Now!



Best Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination products

Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment-discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination sponsors

 

 

Welcome to Employment Discrimination Guide

 

Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.




Employment Work Wrongful Discharge Discrimination News

New York Employment Law Firm Prevails on Behalf of Client, Wins 1.6M Award for Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case

New York employment law attorney Derek T. Smith of the Derek T. Smith Law Group, P.C. successfully pursued a sexual orientation discrimination case on behalf of a Manhattan chef claiming her former employer harassed her for being a lesbian, winning her a total of 1.6M in damagesNew York, NY (PRWEB) April 27, 2012 Derek T. Smith Law Group, P.C. ...

Read more...


How to Earn an 'A´ in Family Leave: Do You Make the Grade?

(5/21) by Susan Schoenfeld, J.D., BLR Senior Legal Editor The report cards are in and over 60 percent of states in the U.S. received a "D" or "F" in their efforts to help new parents with family leave laws, paid leave, job protected leave, and other family-friendly workplace laws. According to the National Partnership for Women and Families ("National Partnership") in their May 2012 report ...

Read more...


Attorney Deborah Weinstein Speaks at ALI-ABA Program on Updating Employee Manuals

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Deborah Weinstein, President of The Weinstein Firm, recently served as ...

Read more...


Thompson gets $7 million but no severance

Not a bad payday for most, though the 'resumegate' controversy cost the former Yahoo CEO an even bigger payout.

Read more...


Thompson leaves Yahoo with no severance

Scott Thompson still walks away with millions, but the "resumegate" controversy costs the former Yahoo CEO a bigger payout. Originally posted at News - Internet & Media

Read more...