Welcome to Employment Discrimination Guide
Employment Discrimination Law Cases Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.
The Value Of The Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967
from:The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 forbids employment discrimination against those 40 years of age or older. Within the act there are also prohibitions against denying older workers benefits and mandatory retirement (unless the person is an executive over the age of 65 entitled to larger than average annual pensions).
Congress wrote the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to combat the rising trend in firing and failure to hire older workers in favor of younger workers. It was a common conception that workers 40 years and over did not have the same abilities or willingness to acquire new skills as a fresh crop of employees, largely amplified by the invidious tendency toward firing older workers with higher pay and replacing them with younger workers eager to accept a position for less money.
This social paradigm is reverberated within the text of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967: “the setting of arbitrary age limits regardless of potential for job performance has become a common practice.” It indicates that the burden of this shortsightedness exacerbates the economy.
Age discrimination may take shape in subtle ways that are difficult to prove. An employer might decline hiring an older worker simply because they feel they do not have long term career outlook with the company, or perhaps assume that a worker over 40 would have health ailments that could decrease their productivity. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 may not outright debunk these myths, but it offers a protection for older workers from prejudice in the workplace – one that pays.
Lawsuits involving age discrimination are among the highest payouts in employment discrimination cases. Unlawful termination like this can lead to an employer having to pay lost wages and benefits, emotional distress, and attorneys fees. Considering these are often cases involving workers who have higher positions as they have moved up the corporate ladder, these punitive damages can be quite high.
A recent case is that of Best Buy versus 44 former IT workers who claim they were discharged and replaced by younger workers. Best Buy settled the case in June of 2007. And in July of 2007, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found Nassau in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and estimates $450,000 in punitive damages to be paid to four wrongfully terminated employees.
What the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 may have helped highlight is the fact that older workers are often those with a wide breadth of knowledge, range of skills, and years of experience under their belts. This offers invaluable contributions and potential to an employer and can reduce costs in training more experienced workers over younger, newer candidates.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 was later amended by the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act in 1986 and fortifies by the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Employment Discrimination Law Cases News
Employers' liability for third party harassment to go as part of discrimination law changes
Rules making companies liable for harassment of their employees by third parties is one of a number of "unnecessary" discrimination regulations that could be repealed in a drive to remove employment law related "red tape", the Government has announced.
Read more...Age Discrimination and the RFOA Defense: What is Reasonable?
(5/22) If you're faced with an age discrimination claim, but in reality your employment decision was based on some other reasonable factor, how do you prove this in court? Even if you're not faced with a lawsuit, how do you understand what constitutes age discrimination and what business practices will keep you in the clear? Do you understand the concept of "reasonable factors other than age ...
Read more...New York Employment Law Firm Prevails on Behalf of Client, Wins 1.6M Award for Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case
New York employment law attorney Derek T. Smith of the Derek T. Smith Law Group, P.C. successfully pursued a sexual orientation discrimination case on behalf of a Manhattan chef claiming her former employer harassed her for being a lesbian, winning her a total of 1.6M in damagesNew York, NY (PRWEB) April 27, 2012 Derek T. Smith Law Group, P.C. ...
Read more...African American Employees Claim Race Discrimination & Discriminatory Employment Practices In Law Suit against Anne ...
African American Employees Claim Race Discrimination & Discriminatory Employment Practices In Lawsuit Against Anne Arundel County Public Library Suit filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, Maryland. By George Rose, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff's. ...
Read more...Negative remarks aren’t always basis for gender discrimination suit
Negative remarks about a worker being “insecure,” “fragile” or “immature” are gender-neutral comments that do not form the basis to support a valid gender employment discrimination claim under federal law. This issue was addressed in the April 10 decision in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case of MyrtaMorales-Cruz v. University of Puerto Rico School of Law. While this case ...
Read more...